They were steamy, naked, touching each other while licking whipped cream off each other's fingers.
Now, if that was the case then DERRRR parents would be piiiised awwwff.
But no, they were posing on the front cover with co-star Corey Monteith looking still relatively OK minus the locker-room underwear.
Doesn't Mr. Monteith look chuffed |
This didn't help |
Let's remark on the way in which PPO occured.
Here is Lea as Rachel. Innocent, sing like a mofo, high-schooler, Glee Club hearting, Rachel.
Now here is suggestively licking lolly-pop, how-did-I-end-up-at-my-school-locker-without-my-pants-whoops, Lea.
See why parents are spitting chips?
I dunno what all the fuss is about really. Here we have two girls (and a guy...and a pizza place) who are NOT in high school. So what if they portray 17 year olds...Dianna's character Quinn had.a.baby last season.
Gosh...she can give birth but when she wears lovely underwear in a men's mag THATS when the parent's come knocking. And do the parents not care about Lea's tattoos?
What do you smelly people think?
Should parents be Pised Awf?
Or does it really matter because it's not like the majority of kids that watch Glee will pick up GQ, flip through and lose their shit?
By all means, lend me your comments.
Smell ya later
x.
All pics from UK Daily Mail
ohhhh goodie id heard alot about these pics but was too lazy to google them myself lol.
ReplyDeletei can see where parents are coming from, these photos are definately not just in GQ mag they have almost managed to go viral, however i am not a parent and therefore do not care wether or not these girls wear clothes as long glee continues to be amazing. the end.